Caucus Systems Exclude Many who want to Vote

I definitely agree with Jodi Katz, who opposes caucuses in a sense that they are not inclusive and exclude many people. As stated, caucuses are only convenient for those who do not have conflicting schedules and transportation issues. However, what about those who do? I, for example, had midterm exams to study for on Wednesday, which made the caucuses very inconvenient for me, even though I would have loved to participate. I am also not able to vote for caucuses because of my state of residency. Furthermore, my state of residency should not be held against me during caucuses. My input and choice of presidency is just as great as any other vote. These caucuses wrongfully exclude those who want to participate, but can not. I can empathize with his first hand.
Systems should be designed so that the consensus of the total population is taken, not just a handful of those who are available. By excluding people who could not make it out such as the disabled, workers, parents with no sitters, and students, just to name a few, you are only getting portions of what people think. As citizens of the United States and of these future presidents, it is critical and vital that we be included. It is aggravating and demeaning to know that systems are being formulated to encourage participation to only a few. I think that there should be online or paper caucus ballots to include everyone. This is fair and there would be a better voter-turnout rate, both now and in the long run. If people feel included and a part of what is taking place now, then they’ll be more apt to participating later on.